SP FIP
weight 12%Mets has the edge in SP FIP (2.2pp).
Mets edge · contribution +2.2pp
Pitching — Mets has the edge in SP FIP (2.2pp). Mets has the edge in SP xFIP (0.6pp). Mets has the edge in Bullpen FIP (1.8pp).
Batting & Roster — Padres has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.2pp). Padres has the edge in WAR (0.3pp). Mets has the edge in Lineup xwOBA (0.1pp).
Situational — Mets has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Padres has the edge in Park Factor (0.2pp).
Combining 7 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a slight edge with Mets ahead by 19pp.
Mets has the edge in SP FIP (2.2pp).
Mets edge · contribution +2.2pp
Mets has the edge in SP xFIP (0.6pp).
Mets edge · contribution +0.6pp
Mets has the edge in Bullpen FIP (1.8pp).
Mets edge · contribution +1.8pp
Padres has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.2pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.2pp
Padres has the edge in WAR (0.3pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.3pp
Mets has the edge in Lineup xwOBA (0.1pp).
Mets edge · contribution +0.1pp
Negligible gap in Barrel%.
Even
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Mets win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Elo/recent form/head-to-head/defense SFR are unimplemented MLB placeholders (always neutral) and are omitted from this chart.
Padres @ Mets · final [15%, 85%] clamp