CIN vs SDP
SP Michael King vs Brady Singer
AI Analysis Summary
Pitching — Padres has the edge in SP FIP (6.6pp). Padres has the edge in SP xFIP (1.3pp). Padres has the edge in Bullpen FIP (5.5pp).
Batting & Roster — Padres has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.1pp). Padres has the edge in WAR (0.6pp). Padres has the edge in Lineup xwOBA (0.1pp).
Situational — Reds has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Padres has the edge in Recent Form (5pp). Padres has the edge in Elo (0.3pp). Reds has the edge in Park Factor (0.4pp).
Combining 9 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a clear edge with Padres ahead by 27pp.
9 Factor Breakdown
SP FIP
weight 12%Padres has the edge in SP FIP (6.6pp).
Padres edge · contribution -6.6pp
SP xFIP
weight 3%Padres has the edge in SP xFIP (1.3pp).
Padres edge · contribution -1.3pp
Bullpen FIP
weight 10%Padres has the edge in Bullpen FIP (5.5pp).
Padres edge · contribution -5.5pp
Lineup wOBA
weight 10%Padres has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.1pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.1pp
WAR
weight 8%Padres has the edge in WAR (0.6pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.6pp
Recent Form
weight 10%Padres has the edge in Recent Form (5pp).
Padres edge · contribution -5pp
Lineup xwOBA
weight 5%Padres has the edge in Lineup xwOBA (0.1pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.1pp
Barrel%
weight 3%Negligible gap in Barrel%.
Even
Elo
weight 10%Padres has the edge in Elo (0.3pp).
Padres edge · contribution -0.3pp
Cumulative Factor Impact (waterfall)
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Reds win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Defense SFR is an unimplemented MLB placeholder (always neutral) and is omitted from this chart — Elo, recent form, and head-to-head are real per-team data.
Padres @ Reds · final [15%, 85%] clamp
Model metadata
Quant model: mlb_v0.1 · generated 12h before game time