SP FIP
weight 12%Rangers has the edge in SP FIP (0.8pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.8pp
Pitching — Rangers has the edge in SP FIP (0.8pp). Rangers has the edge in SP xFIP (0.4pp). Rangers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (0.7pp).
Batting & Roster — Rangers has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.5pp). Rangers has the edge in WAR (0.6pp).
Situational — Rangers has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Angels has the edge in Recent Form (10pp). Rangers has the edge in Elo (0.5pp).
Combining 10 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a close contest with Angels ahead by 2pp.
Rangers has the edge in SP FIP (0.8pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.8pp
Rangers has the edge in SP xFIP (0.4pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.4pp
Rangers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (0.7pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.7pp
Rangers has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.5pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.5pp
Rangers has the edge in WAR (0.6pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.6pp
Angels has the edge in Recent Form (10pp).
Angels edge · contribution -10pp
Negligible gap in Head-to-Head.
Even
Negligible gap in Lineup xwOBA.
Even
Negligible gap in Barrel%.
Even
Rangers has the edge in Elo (0.5pp).
Rangers edge · contribution +0.5pp
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Rangers win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Defense SFR is an unimplemented MLB placeholder (always neutral) and is omitted from this chart — Elo, recent form, and head-to-head are real per-team data.
Angels @ Rangers · final [15%, 85%] clamp
Last 3 games — our model's prediction vs actual result