CHC vs MIL
SP Kyle Harrison vs Clay Holmes
AI Analysis Summary
Pitching — Brewers has the edge in SP FIP (13.6pp). Brewers has the edge in SP xFIP (1.6pp). Brewers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (11.3pp).
Batting & Roster — Cubs has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.6pp). Cubs has the edge in WAR (0.9pp).
Situational — Cubs has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Brewers has the edge in Recent Form (15pp). Cubs has the edge in Head-to-Head (0.5pp). Cubs has the edge in Elo (0.4pp). Cubs has the edge in Park Factor (0.1pp).
Combining 10 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a clear edge with Brewers ahead by 67pp.
10 Factor Breakdown
SP FIP
weight 12%Brewers has the edge in SP FIP (13.6pp).
Brewers edge · contribution -13.6pp
SP xFIP
weight 3%Brewers has the edge in SP xFIP (1.6pp).
Brewers edge · contribution -1.6pp
Bullpen FIP
weight 10%Brewers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (11.3pp).
Brewers edge · contribution -11.3pp
Lineup wOBA
weight 10%Cubs has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.6pp).
Cubs edge · contribution +0.6pp
WAR
weight 8%Cubs has the edge in WAR (0.9pp).
Cubs edge · contribution +0.9pp
Recent Form
weight 10%Brewers has the edge in Recent Form (15pp).
Brewers edge · contribution -15pp
Head-to-Head
weight 3%Cubs has the edge in Head-to-Head (0.5pp).
Cubs edge · contribution +0.5pp
Lineup xwOBA
weight 5%Negligible gap in Lineup xwOBA.
Even
Barrel%
weight 3%Negligible gap in Barrel%.
Even
Elo
weight 10%Cubs has the edge in Elo (0.4pp).
Cubs edge · contribution +0.4pp
Cumulative Factor Impact (waterfall)
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Cubs win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Defense SFR is an unimplemented MLB placeholder (always neutral) and is omitted from this chart — Elo, recent form, and head-to-head are real per-team data.
Brewers @ Cubs · final [15%, 85%] clamp
Recent Meetings (Brewers vs Cubs)
Last 3 games — our model's prediction vs actual result
Model metadata
Quant model: mlb_v0.1 · generated 13h before game time