DET vs CLE
Final: CLE 4 - 6 DET
AI Analysis Summary
Pitching — Tigers has the edge in SP FIP (1.1pp). Guardians has the edge in SP xFIP (0.4pp). Tigers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (0.9pp).
Batting & Roster — Tigers has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.8pp). Tigers has the edge in WAR (0.1pp). Tigers has the edge in Lineup xwOBA (0.4pp). Tigers has the edge in Barrel% (0.1pp).
Situational — Tigers has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Guardians has the edge in Park Factor (0.2pp).
Combining 7 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a slight edge with Tigers ahead by 12pp.
7 Factor Breakdown
SP FIP
weight 12%Tigers has the edge in SP FIP (1.1pp).
Tigers edge · contribution +1.1pp
SP xFIP
weight 3%Guardians has the edge in SP xFIP (0.4pp).
Guardians edge · contribution -0.4pp
Bullpen FIP
weight 10%Tigers has the edge in Bullpen FIP (0.9pp).
Tigers edge · contribution +0.9pp
Lineup wOBA
weight 10%Tigers has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.8pp).
Cumulative Factor Impact (waterfall)
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Tigers win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Defense SFR is an unimplemented MLB placeholder (always neutral) and is omitted from this chart — Elo, recent form, and head-to-head are real per-team data.
Guardians @ Tigers · final [15%, 85%] clamp
Model metadata
Quant model: v1.0 · debate version v1-narrative