PHI vs NYM
Final: NYM 4 - 1 PHI
AI Analysis Summary
Pitching — Phillies has the edge in SP FIP (2.6pp). Phillies has the edge in SP xFIP (1.4pp). Phillies has the edge in Bullpen FIP (2.2pp).
Batting & Roster — Phillies has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.2pp).
Situational — Phillies has the edge in Home Advantage (5.6pp). Phillies has the edge in Park Factor (0.1pp).
Combining 7 sabermetric factors, the quantitative model sees a slight edge with Phillies ahead by 11pp.
7 Factor Breakdown
SP FIP
weight 12%Phillies has the edge in SP FIP (2.6pp).
Phillies edge · contribution +2.6pp
SP xFIP
weight 3%Phillies has the edge in SP xFIP (1.4pp).
Phillies edge · contribution +1.4pp
Bullpen FIP
weight 10%Phillies has the edge in Bullpen FIP (2.2pp).
Phillies edge · contribution +2.2pp
Lineup wOBA
weight 10%Phillies has the edge in Lineup wOBA (0.2pp).
Cumulative Factor Impact (waterfall)
Starts at a neutral 50% → each factor's impact accumulates → final Phillies win probability. Right (green) = home favored / left (red) = away favored. Defense SFR is an unimplemented MLB placeholder (always neutral) and is omitted from this chart — Elo, recent form, and head-to-head are real per-team data.
Mets @ Phillies · final [15%, 85%] clamp
Model metadata
Quant model: v1.0 · debate version v1-narrative